Dansk Fysisk Selskab Årsmøde, Lalandia, Rødby, Maj 18, 1993
Excerpted and edited July 5, 2019
[For A very brief history of universality in period doubling click here]
[For hyperlinks to some of the literature, click here]
Among my friends at Cornell were two called Feigenbaum. The first one moved to a factory town to do union organizing, and reached brief national fame when the Mafia bombed his house. The other one was amazingly fast in solving New York Times crossword puzzles, but he published nothing. Hans Bethe dispatched him to Blackhole, Virginia, where he languished publishing nothing until Peter Carruthers rescued him and took him to Los Alamos on the risky presumption that the man seemed very smart. In contrast to these good-for-nothings, I was advertised as the best thing since Roman Jackiw and sent off to Stanford, Princeton and Oxford with a mission to solve the QCD quark confinement problem.
[...]
Mitchell told me about existence of period doubling universality at 10pm on December 19 1975, in a bar in New York City, over a glass of good red wine and in presence of my Black Irish Poetess.
In spring 1976 he came from Los Alamos to visit Princeton, having published even less than before. He gave a seminar, but nobody understood a word. Starting point was a parabola, then things got incredibly complicated, and at the end it turned out that the theory might be applicable to fluctuations in forest moth populations.
During his graduate school years at MIT, the strongest intellectual influence on Mitchell was not his adviser Francis Low (of Gell-Mann--Low beta function), who by that time had lost faith in quantum field theory, but charismatic cognitive scientist Jerry Lettvin. So Mitchell and I were driven by a secret agenda - the thing was robust, you could make it very imperfect, and a universal superstructure would survive the imperfections. In other words, just what you need to build a brain - all parts imperfect, and the thing functions anyway.
But my first task was to help my friend, make his lecture comprehensible. My friend Betty Boop worked on a Hewlett-Packard assembly line, so I was able to acquire a discounted programmable pocket calculator (with [multiply] and [divide] buttons interchanged) for a mere one-fourth of my monthly salary. Mitchell needed no such display of dedication, Los Alamos was floating in money.
I started thinking about functional equations on May 1, 1976. I calculated away with such gusto that I was calculating even laying on my belly on an operating table, with a surgeon lancing a large bicycle-caused sore. Eventually I reduced the whole complicated mess to one equation, wrote down the period doubling fixed point function equation on May 3, 1976,
and went off to the math library to look it up. The Institute has an excellent math library, but I did not find it. As a matter of fact, we never found it to this very day - it had never been written down before.
For the record: universality in period doubling and the functional renormalization theory that explains it were Mitchell's discovery, my contribution was to recast what was an infinite tower of renormalization equations into a more concise form.
As one would expect, nobody wanted to hear about it. To be fair, I remember that a total of four people did: Freeman Dyson, John Milnor, Bill Thurston, and Donna Lee. Donna Lee is a wonderful San Franciscan whom I love even more dearly than Dyson; the rest you should know.
I went around spreading the news. In those days it was impossible for most to access the literature in a field so new, with foundational publications spread across so many specialties, so a put together a book of source materials:
3 comments:
Very nice, Predrag. Grazie.
Thank you, Predrag.
Nice blog thanks for postiing
Post a Comment